Discover Now
Funded Student Projects
Dialogue McGill funds students who research access to health and social services for English-speaking populations in Quebec. After a diligent internal review by Dialogue McGill’s research committee, the following student projects were selected for funding.
Exploring associations between social determinants of health and patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: Elucidating the disparities to be addressed
Social determinants of health, including income, education, and language, play an important role in cancer outcomes and survival. In Quebec, where nearly one in five residents speaks a first language other than French, language can be a particularly important barrier to accessing healthcare services and communicating effectively with care teams. These barriers may influence patients’ ability to advocate for themselves, ask questions, and engage in shared decision-making—factors that are linked to improved health outcomes.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized tools that allow patients to report symptoms and health status directly, and are increasingly used to improve communication, symptom monitoring, and clinical care. However, their effectiveness may vary depending on social factors such as education and language. This PhD project begins by examining how PROM data differ across key social determinants of health. Future phases will explore patients’ lived experiences completing PROMs and assess whether generative AI tools can help reduce barriers—particularly language-related barriers—to improve equitable use of PROMs in cancer care.
Empowering Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of the Perception of Voice Cloning in Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that often leads to severe speech impairment and, in most cases, the loss of functional speech within a short period after symptom onset. To maintain communication, individuals with ALS rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) tools, including emerging technologies such as AI-based voice cloning. Unlike traditional voice banking methods, voice cloning can offer faster setup, greater flexibility, and potentially more natural-sounding synthetic voices, but its acceptability and perceived value among users remain poorly understood.
This study explores how English-speaking persons living with ALS in Quebec perceive voice cloning technology, particularly in terms of ethics, usability, emotional resonance, and identity preservation. It also examines whether perceptions of naturalness, expressiveness, and identity differ according to the severity of speech impairment. The goal is to better understand user perspectives to support the ethical and patient-centred integration of voice cloning technologies in ALS care.
Advancing equitable health and primary health care access for English-speaking Black communities in Quebec
Language is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of health, particularly in contexts where linguistic and racial identities intersect. In Quebec, the English-speaking Black community (ESBC) occupies a unique position at the intersection of racialized minority status and official language minority status. Despite this, there is limited disaggregated data on how these intersecting identities shape access to primary healthcare and health outcomes. This gap reflects broader systemic challenges in Canadian health research, including a lack of representation of racialized populations in available data and a relative scarcity of Canadian studies compared to other countries.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, our research team, in partnership with the Black Community Resource Centre (BCRC), has investigated health inequities affecting Black communities in Quebec. Our previous work has identified racial and linguistic disparities in healthcare experiences, including lower vaccination uptake, higher distrust in the healthcare system, reduced access to regular healthcare providers, and less access to COVID-19–related information among English-speaking Black communities compared to other groups. We also found that perceived discrimination is linked to poorer health outcomes and lower satisfaction with care. Building on these findings, this study uses Self-Determination Theory to examine how perceptions of restricted collective autonomy and language barriers shape healthcare access and dissatisfaction among ESBC populations in Quebec. The goal is to better understand the mechanisms driving inequities in healthcare experiences and outcomes, and to inform more equitable health system responses.
Linguistic minority status and Psychosis trajectories in Québec: A study of Pathways to care and Outcomes
Psychotic disorders are among the most severe mental health conditions and often emerge during early adulthood, a critical period for education, employment, and social development. Immigrant populations and their children are disproportionately affected, yet they frequently encounter barriers to timely and appropriate mental health care. These barriers include delayed access to services, higher rates of police involvement or compulsory treatment, and increased likelihood of disengagement from care. Emerging evidence suggests that language proficiency may play an important but understudied role in shaping both access to care and long-term outcomes in psychosis.
This project examines how linguistic minority status influences pathways to care and clinical outcomes in individuals with first-episode psychosis in Montréal, particularly in a predominantly French-language treatment context. It will assess whether prior findings on treatment disengagement can be replicated in a new cohort, and explore how language background relates to key indicators such as mode of entry into care, duration of untreated psychosis, symptom progression, and vocational recovery. The goal is to better understand how language barriers shape mental health trajectories and to inform more equitable, accessible psychosis care for linguistic minority communities.
Exploring Healthcare Equity: How to Increase Satisfaction for Non-Francophone Immigrants Using Telemedicine Services
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the rapid adoption of digital health tools, particularly telemedicine, which has transformed how healthcare is delivered in Canada. Telemedicine improves access to care and supports national goals of health equity, especially for populations facing geographic or systemic barriers. However, Canada’s linguistic diversity also raises important questions about whether digital health services are equally accessible across language groups.
In Quebec, where French-first policies shape many aspects of healthcare delivery, telemedicine services may not consistently address the linguistic and cultural needs of non-francophone patients. This can create barriers for immigrant and minority-language communities seeking care through virtual platforms. This study explores how telemedicine experiences can be improved for non-francophone immigrant patients in Quebec by identifying and addressing linguistic and cultural barriers that impact user satisfaction and access to care.
Bilingual Language Development in Children with ASD
It all begins with an idea.
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can become bilingual however, when children receive the diagnosis of ASD, professionals in the fields of healthcare and education often recommend that minority language parents refrain from using their minority language and instead speak only the majority language with their child. Such recommendations are based on the belief that deficits often reported in children with ASD, such as attending to others and difficulty with phonology, will make the acquisition of two languages difficult. However, such recommendations are not supported by current evidence.
We aim to better understand how the bilingual experience impacts language acquisition in these children and examine whether there are differences in language learning between monolingual children with ASD and their bilingual peers. We predict that bilingual and monolingual children with ASD will have formal language abilities similar to those of their bilingual and monolingual neurotypical peers. We also predict that while neurotypical children will have better performances on the narrative tasks than their peers with ASD, bilingual children with ASD will outperform their monolingual peers with ASD given their improved socio-pragmatic skills.